🔗 Share this article

I have a few opinions about the comments delivered by ESPN broadcaster Chris Fowler following Novak Djokovic's win over Taylor Fritz in the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, Fowler is American – and sports frequently encourage nationalism. Some disappointment would have been understandable. Instead, Fowler brought up the ongoing drought of US male players at the majors: not one of them had lifted a title since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the competition.

Everyone love a storyline, myself included. But really. Suppose Fritz defeated Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was waiting in the next round, who Fritz has never defeated in an official match. And had he somehow gotten past that, it would have been title holder the Italian, versus him Fritz had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the last seven grand slams (and the Spaniard proceeded to defeat a tired Serbian in the next round). He stated in press following his defeat that he in fact preferred his path, because it offered the opportunity to beat the top three competitors in the world back-to-back. Fritz is well within his right to aspire to the achievement; an competitor is supposed to have faith in themselves. But going into that Djokovic quarter-final what other person in their right mind had the drought of American champions on the brain?

Coco Gauff’s second serve the only thing between her and consistent victories

The American, 28, is placed fourth in the world entering this week’s year-end championships and has won his last six matches over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. It's likely he could take that spot for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that at present, that’s as high as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard lie a vast gap of ranking points away. His elite serve and concussive power on both front side and backhand are more than enough to defeat most rivals on the professional circuit. When facing the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, though, he is often overmatched. The past few years has seen the interesting rise of tall, gangly players who can nonetheless move around with the alarming speed and grace of much shorter men. He is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the opponent was controlling, and playing a drop shot against him is typically a safe bet. That serves as a pretty harsh limitation on his upside.

Fritz has made a several dramatic, improbable improvements over the years. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the bottom of the world's best thirty. 24 months after, he was sniffing the elite ten. Last year, he unexpectedly surged up to No 4 – and held the spot. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and beating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and even a aging Serbian, is the toughest of all. What could the commentator have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the ongoing slump of US male players winning grand slams when Fritz had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the appreciation for the difficulty of the task insufficient.

The American star achieved a personal best run to the All England Club semi-finals in the summer.

The American's performance in that exact last eight match ought to have been enough of an sign. Djokovic won in four rounds, a victory that only seemed uncertain for moments towards the very end, when Fritz had survived a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair appeared well-balanced during the exchanges, with the American earning plenty of opportunities to break. But the champion saved break point after service break opportunity, prolonging the run to the point of frustration. When Fritz finally did convert a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a terrible game to drop serve once more; Djokovic had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the main contest and compelled him to use far too much energy to prevail. Down set points in the final game, Fritz’s primary delivery sailed to heaven. He extended the match twice on his backup delivery, but finally committed two errors. It wasn’t a choke, I didn’t think, just a result of having to hit too many second serves.

The contest was quite compelling proof that the American is not good enough to defeat any version of the Serbian, that was defeated by the Spaniard in the following match and did not particularly seem like he believed he could triumph. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the peak of his athletic abilities now, but has acquired sufficient experience and strategic intelligence to make up for quite a bit of the decline. The issue is those who were expecting the American to prevail, and putting pressure on him to do so, when he was yet to accomplished anything that suggested he would.

Fritz is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a calm, reflective voice in media sessions, more so than almost anyone on the ATP aside from the Russian star, willing to not just express his emotions or the strategy he believed determined a match, but explain it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the responsibility for the United States failing to spawn a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick seems unjust. (Now that Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, maybe they can divide that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably think about it forever if I fail to accomplish it,” the American informed a journalist in June of claiming a major. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t fulfill that goal, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is in fact highly improbable for everybody else. {